● Cyber Threat Intelligence Consulting

Intelligence-grade CTI — without building a full internal team

Most organizations need strategic and operational threat intelligence — but don't have the budget, headcount, or time to build a mature CTI function from scratch. We provide the intelligence output your security team, leadership, and board need, structured for your specific threat environment.

Discuss a CTI Engagement What We Provide Book a Free 20-min Call

The Gap

Generic threat feeds are not intelligence. Intelligence is context applied to your specific situation.

Commercial threat feeds deliver indicators. They don't tell you which threats are actually relevant to your organization, sector, and geography — or what those threats mean for your specific security posture, gaps, and upcoming decisions.

📡

Feed Without Context

Thousands of IOCs per day — but no guidance on which actors are actually targeting your industry, your geography, or your specific technology stack.

🧩

No Finished Intelligence

Raw data requires analysts to synthesize it into actionable conclusions. Without a CTI function, that synthesis doesn't happen — and the data goes unused.

📋

Board Visibility Gap

Security teams understand the threat landscape. Boards and leadership often don't — not because the information isn't there, but because it isn't being translated into strategic language.

🔮

Reactive Instead of Predictive

Without forward-looking intelligence, security investments are driven by what happened last. CTI allows investment and posture decisions to be driven by what is likely to happen next.

Who This Is For

Organizations that need intelligence-grade CTI without the overhead

CTI consulting works best when the engagement is built around a specific requirement — a threat environment you need mapped, a board that needs briefing, or a retainer that keeps your team continuously informed.

Mid-Market Enterprises

Security teams of 5–30 people who need strategic and operational intelligence but can't justify a full-time senior CTI analyst or threat researcher.

MSSPs and MDR Providers

Managed security providers who need CTI research to improve detection quality, produce client reports, or support escalation analysis with sector-specific context.

Financial Institutions

Banks, fintechs, and investment firms in the Middle East and Eastern European corridors — sectors with elevated, sector-specific threat actor activity requiring dedicated tracking.

Boards Requiring Threat Visibility

Organizations where the board, audit committee, or risk committee requires regular threat intelligence briefings that connect the external threat landscape to business risk.

Also relevant for: legal and compliance teams requiring threat landscape assessments for regulatory submissions · M&A teams assessing the cyber threat posture of acquisition targets · CISOs at newly formed or rapidly scaling organizations establishing their first CTI capability.

What We Provide

Finished intelligence — structured for the audience that needs to act on it

Every deliverable is written for a specific consumer: technical teams who need to hunt and detect, security leadership who need to prioritize and invest, or executives and boards who need to govern and communicate risk.

Sector-specific threat landscape assessments
Threat actor profiles relevant to your organization and geography
Campaign tracking and early warning on active threats
TTP analysis and detection guidance for security operations
Dark web and underground forum monitoring
Ransomware group targeting research and leak site monitoring
Board and executive threat briefings (written for non-technical readers)
CTI program advisory for organizations building internal capability
Third-party and supply chain threat exposure assessment
Geopolitical risk integration for organizations operating in affected regions

Sample deliverable format

Threat Landscape Report

Executive Briefing

How Intelligence Is Delivered

Four formats — each calibrated to a different consumer and decision cycle

Intelligence only works if it reaches the right person in the right form at the right time. Deliverable format is agreed at the start of each engagement to match your team's actual consumption patterns.

Strategic

Threat Landscape Reports

Quarterly or semi-annual assessments of the threat environment relevant to your sector, region, and organization type. Designed for security leadership and board consumption.

Operational

Threat Bulletins

Short, timely reports on specific active threats, campaigns, or actor activity — produced when a relevant development requires your security team's attention.

Executive

Board Briefings

Written for non-technical readers. Connects the external threat landscape to business risk, regulatory exposure, and strategic decisions in language boards can act on.

Research

Custom Intelligence

Ad hoc deep dives — a specific threat actor, a sector your organization is entering, a technology you're adopting, or a geopolitical development affecting your operations.

Engagement Structure

Project or retainer — structured around your actual intelligence requirements

📋 Project: 4–8 weeks

🔄 Retainer: 3-month minimum

⚡ First deliverable: Within 2 weeks

Requirements scoping

We define your threat environment — sector, geography, technology stack, and the decisions your team and leadership need intelligence to support. This drives every subsequent deliverable.

Threat actor and campaign mapping

Identification of which threat actors, ransomware groups, and campaigns are currently active and relevant to your organization — from open, technical, and dark web sources.

Finished intelligence production

Raw research is synthesized into finished deliverables — written, structured, and calibrated for the specific audience receiving each report.

Delivery and debrief

Each deliverable is accompanied by a debrief session — for the security team, for leadership, or for the board — to ensure findings are understood and can inform decisions.

Ongoing monitoring (retainer)

For retainer engagements, continuous monitoring of actor activity, dark web developments, and threat landscape changes — with ad hoc bulletins when significant developments require immediate attention.

Anonymized Example

CTI that changed a board's security investment decision

Details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.

European Financial Institution · Series B · Expanding into Israeli and Eastern European markets

A European fintech expanding into the Israeli and Eastern European markets commissioned a CTI engagement to understand the specific threat landscape before deployment. Their existing security program was built around Western European threat models and had no visibility into threat actors active in the target regions.

The engagement produced a threat landscape assessment identifying three ransomware groups with active targeting in the Eastern European financial sector, two of which had compromised companies in adjacent sectors in the preceding six months. A second deliverable profiled a financial fraud actor specifically targeting cross-border payment rails of the type the company was deploying. Board briefing materials connected the identified threats to specific business risk — regulatory exposure from data breach notification requirements in new jurisdictions, operational disruption risk during the high-stakes launch window, and reputational risk from association with a sector that had experienced several high-profile incidents.

The board approved an additional security budget for the launch window based directly on the threat briefing. Three specific detection rules were deployed based on the TTP analysis. The company launched without incident.

FAQ

Common questions

How is this different from a commercial threat intelligence platform?

Platforms provide data — indicators, feeds, and actor databases. They require your analysts to do the synthesis, prioritization, and contextualization. We provide finished intelligence — already synthesized, written for your specific audience, and calibrated to your threat environment. Many clients use both.

We already have a security team. Why would we need external CTI?

CTI is a specialty within security. Most security teams are skilled at operations — detection, response, and engineering — not at producing finished intelligence for executive and board consumption, or at maintaining continuous monitoring across dark web and underground sources. External CTI augments your team's capabilities where their time and specialization have limits.

What does a retainer engagement look like month to month?

A retainer typically includes a recurring strategic deliverable (monthly or quarterly, depending on scope), ad hoc bulletins when significant threat developments occur, and access to a debrief call for any deliverable. The cadence is agreed at the start and adjusted if the threat environment changes.

Can you produce board-level briefings that non-technical executives can understand?

Yes — this is one of the most common engagement types. Board briefings translate the threat landscape into business language: what is the risk to operations, revenue, and reputation; how does it compare to sector peers; what is management doing about it; and what decisions does the board need to make. No technical background required to read them.

Do you cover specific geographies like Israel or the CIS region?

Yes. Native Hebrew and Russian language capability gives us direct access to threat actor activity, forums, and media in Israeli, Russian-speaking, and Eastern European contexts — intelligence that is missed by most English-only CTI providers.

How quickly can you start?

For urgent engagements — a known incident, a board briefing scheduled in the near term, or a launch decision with a hard deadline — we can typically begin within days and produce a first deliverable within two weeks of scoping completion.